What a nice rock,
To see in the day
In the light clearly,
Interesting to look at
Anyway,
Just comment for a second:
Graham Hancock’s book Underworld (2002)
Had a dialogue with some German geologist
As a foil basically for the topic
Of seeing “rock face” underwater over there, and in general elsewhere too,
And the effigy rock look is to the point
Of what the “German geologist’s position was trying say:
“They as people, humans essentially always see the rock in face, that’s just what they as people do, but they’re full of it basically and it’s all just other natures that they and you don’t understand,” and &c.,
Like then he goes on to say
“It was nothing other than naturally there anyway
Whatever that means to the “geology” man then is
“Nothing to see”
But for just the allegation and without any confirmation that they would ever agree to see what we see
We don’t think we agree
“Principally, principally
“On the issues
About the basic principles of form and vision, and then
What is clearly given here
Is “rock face” prime:
All roads lead back
To what is true in fine
To make the point
For all time.
ENHAKKORE 